For decades, menstruation has been shrouded in Stigma across India, so much so that only 36% of girls receive any prior education about periods, according to a World Bank survey. But now, Sikkim University is challenging the status quo. In December 2024, the institution introduced a monthly menstrual leave policy, allowing female students one day off per month without affecting their attendance record.
The move, proposed by the Sikkim University Students’ Association (SUSA), marks a turning point in how educational institutions address women’s health. But is this policy a temporary fix, or does it signal a more profound shift toward gender equity in academia?
The Policy: What’s Changing?
Under the new rule, female students can take one day of monthly leave for menstrual health needs. The absence counts toward the mandatory 75% attendance requirement, meaning students won’t be penalized for prioritizing their well-being. However, the leave does not apply during exam periods, ensuring academic integrity.
Registrar Laxuman Sharma officially notified the policy on December 4, 2024, following advocacy from student leaders. This makes Sikkim University one of the few Indian institutions recognizing menstrual health as a legitimate reason for formal absence.
Why This Matters: Health, Grades, and Gender Equality
1. Tackling Dysmenorrhea (Painful Periods)
Studies show that 71.5% of women experience dysmenorrhea—severe cramps that disrupt daily life (Chen et al., 2016). Without accommodations, many students force themselves to attend classes in pain, hurting both their health and academic performance.
2. Reducing Absenteeism Without Penalty
Previously, students who skipped classes due to period pain risked falling below the 75% attendance rule, which could bar them from exams. Now, they can rest without academic consequences.
3. Fighting Stigma
In India, menstruation remains a taboo subject—only 48% of women use sanitary pads, while others rely on unsafe alternatives (NFHS-5, 2019-21). By acknowledging the period of leave, Sikkim University helps normalize the conversation.
Challenges: Could This Backfire?
While the policy is groundbreaking, it has sparked debates:
1. Will It Reinforce Stereotypes?
Critics argue that menstrual leave could fuel workplace discrimination, with employers assuming women are “less reliable.” Similar concerns arose in Japan, where a 1947 menstrual leave law is rarely used due to Stigma.
2. What About Non-Binary and Trans Students?
The policy currently applies only to female students, excluding transgender men and non-binary individuals who menstruate. Experts suggest expanding the language for inclusivity.
3. Will Other Universities Follow?
So far, only Kochi University has a similar policy in India. Without nationwide adoption, students elsewhere still face the same struggles.
Student Reactions: A Step Forward
While official surveys are pending, early student feedback is positive. A third-year sociology student, Riya Sharma, shared: “Before this, I’d pop painkillers and drag myself to class. Now, I can recover.”
The Sikkim University Students’ Association (SUSA), which pushed for the policy, calls it a “first victory” in a larger fight for gender-sensitive education.
Global Comparisons: How Does India Stack Up?
1. Spain (2023) – The first European country to introduce paid menstrual leave.
2. Japan (1947) – Offers unpaid leave, but few women use it due to workplace stigma.
3. South Korea – Grants one day per month, but uptake remains low.
India’s approach is still evolving. While Bihar and Kerala offer menstrual leave for government staff, most states lack policies for students.
The Road Ahead: What’s Next?
Sikkim University’s decision sets a precedent, but experts say more steps are needed:
- Menstrual health workshops to educate students and staff.
- Inclusive policies for transgender and non-binary individuals.
- National discussions on standardizing menstrual leave in schools and workplaces.
Conclusion: A Small Step With Big Implications
Sikkim University’s policy is more than just a day off—it’s a statement that menstrual health matters. While challenges remain, the move could inspire other institutions to follow.
As Dr. Anjali Rao, a public health expert, puts it: “You can’t achieve gender equality if half the population is expected to ignore their biology.”
The question now is: Will the rest of India take note?
