Sikkim’s Legal Showdown: CAP President Ganesh Rai Faces Charges Under New Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

Gangtok, Sikkim: Sikkim’s political landscape has been rocked by a fresh legal battle after Citizen Action Party (CAP) President Ganesh Rai and several party members were charged under the newly enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, following an alleged trespassing incident at an under-construction commercial site in Gangtok. The FIR filed against CAP chief Ganesh Rai, filed at Sadar Police Station (Case No. 53/2025), has sparked debates over political activism, legal accountability, and the state’s rapid urban development.

The Incident: A Confrontation at the Star Mall Site

On April 7, 2025, around 2:00 PM, Ganesh Rai and a group of CAP supporters entered the construction site of Star Mall in New Market, Gangtok, claiming the project was being built illegally. According to the FIR filed by Krishna Ghimerey, a resident overseeing the construction, Rai and his associates allegedly issued threats, demanding an immediate halt to the work.

Police have registered the case under Sections 329(3), 351(2), and 3(5) of the BNS, which deal with unlawful assembly, criminal intimidation, and obstructing lawful activities. One person has been detained under Section 170 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and two vehicles were penalized under the Motor Vehicles Act 1988.

Why This Case Matters: The BNS Angle

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in 2023, is being tested in Sikkim for the first time in a high-profile political case. Legal experts say this could set a precedent for applying the law in disputes involving politicians and development projects.

Section 329(3): Covers unlawful assembly intending to commit an offence.
Section 351(2): Pertains to criminal intimidation.
Section 3(5): Addresses obstruction of lawful work.

Legal analyst Rohit Sharma explains: “This case will determine how strictly the BNS is enforced against political figures. If proven guilty, Rai could face fines or even imprisonment, sending a strong message against political interference in development projects.”

CAP’s Defense: Fighting Corruption or Political Drama?

CAP has denied any wrongdoing, arguing that they were exposing illegal construction practices. In a press conference, Rai stated: “We acted in the public interest. The Star Mall project lacks proper approvals, and we will prove this in court.”

This isn’t the first time CAP has taken legal action over development issues. In 2023, the party filed an FIR against Sikkim Chief Minister Prem Tamang, accusing his government of negligence during the Glacial Lake Outburst Flood (GLOF) disaster. That case is still pending.

Public Reaction: Divided Opinions

The incident has polarized public opinion:

Supporters hail CAP for challenging unchecked construction in Gangtok.
Critics accuse the party of staging political stunts ahead of the 2025 state elections.

Local shopkeeper Mingma Sherpa told us: “If the construction is illegal, authorities should investigate. But storming a site and threatening workers is not the right way.”

Broader Implications for Sikkim

Sikkim has seen rapid infrastructure growth, but concerns over environmental violations and illegal constructions persist. The 2023 GLOF disaster, which killed dozens, raised questions about lax regulations.

If Rai is convicted, political groups could be discouraged from taking extralegal measures to oppose projects. However, if CAP’s claims about illegal construction are proven true, it may force stricter oversight of future developments.

What’s Next?

The police investigation is ongoing.
CAP plans to challenge the FIR, calling it politically motivated.
Legal experts predict a protracted court battle, given the case’s high-profile nature.

Conclusion: A Test for Sikkim’s Democracy

This case isn’t just about a trespassing charge—it’s about how Sikkim balances development, law, and political activism. Will the BNS ensure accountability, or will it deepen political divisions? The answer could reshape governance in the state.

Recent Controversial Projects: